- Index Auto
Home / Jaguar XK-SS / 1957 Jaguar /
Jaguar XK-SS 1957 Review / Jaguar Autocenter
Filed under: Jaguar,
1957 Jaguar XK-SS 1957
Filed under: Jaguar,
British luxury car manufacturer, Jaguar, decided to focus its attention on the XK model and so, came up with the idea of the XK-SS. This model is actually the road-going version of the Jaguar D-Type. The carmaker only had the opportunity to build 16 units of the XK-SS as the Jaguar factory was destroyed as a result of a big fire. The molds of the car were ruined as well and this is why there were only 16 cars developed of the XK-SS model.
Jaguar XK-SS 1957 review:
The XK-SS is the road-going version of the Jaguar D-Type. Only 16 XK-SS's were built before a fire destroyed the Jaguar factory and the molds for the car. End of Jaguar XK-SS 1957 review.
..Digg |
..StumbleUpon |
..Twitter |
..Technorati |
..Reddit |
..FaceBook |
...MySapce |
...Google |
..Email it |
Share
- BMW will introduce the 316i, 320i and 3-Series xDrive models
- A recall affects Ferrari California and 458 models
- Chevrolet will offer a 2014 SS sedan
- One of the Jaguar XJ220 will be auctioned
- Infiniti FX Sebastian Vettel concept is now for sale
- Nissan revealed the price of the Juke-R
- Peugeot - Naza agreement for assembly of compact cars in Malaysia
- Volkswagen Touran tuning kit has been unveiled by MR Car Design
- Porsche developed Macan Compact SUV
All cars from Jaguar
2007 Jaguar XK 4.2 UK Version
2009 Jaguar XF
2007 Jaguar Proteus C-type
2008 Jaguar S-Type R
1957 Jaguar XK-SS 1957
2003 Jaguar XF 10 Concept by Fuore Design
2008 Jaguar S-Type
2007 Jaguar XF
2006 Jaguar XK Victory Edition
1966 Jaguar XJ 13 1966
2012 Jaguar XJ Ring Taxi2009 Jaguar XF
2007 Jaguar Proteus C-type
2008 Jaguar S-Type R
1957 Jaguar XK-SS 1957
2003 Jaguar XF 10 Concept by Fuore Design
2008 Jaguar S-Type
2007 Jaguar XF
2006 Jaguar XK Victory Edition
1966 Jaguar XJ 13 1966
2012 Jaguar F-Type
2012 Jaguar Ultimate XJ
Jaguar XJ Sovereign 4.0
Jaguar XJ 6 3.2 S
Jaguar XJ 6 3.2 S
Jaguar XJ 6 3.2 Luxury Edition
Yes No